2 min read

The 2008 Olmert Proposal: What Was Offered and What Abbas Did

Ehud Olmert and Mahmoud Abbas negotiated a package in 2008 covering borders, Jerusalem, refugees, and security, but they did not sign an agreement or finalize a map. Abbas later said he did not reject the proposal outright and explained why he could not accept the map as presented.

Miriam Bernstein

Miriam Bernstein is the pen name of Hasbara’s Resources desk. Every article is sourced and cited.

Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and PA President Mahmoud Abbas held direct negotiations in 2008 after the Annapolis conference. Olmert presented a comprehensive proposal in September, including territorial swaps, arrangements for Jerusalem, and a limited refugee framework. The parties never signed a final agreement, and the detailed map was not jointly accepted. Olmert’s offer should therefore not be described as an agreed border or as a completed offer accepted or rejected in full.

The map and the disputed account

Olmert later described a state on roughly 94 percent of Judea and Samaria, with land swaps, and a special arrangement for the holy basin in Jerusalem. The commonly cited percentage depends on how the territory and swaps are counted. The proposal’s map was shown to Abbas but not left with him for study, according to accounts by both principals, and no mutually authenticated final map was signed. The U.S. State Department’s Annapolis conference statement records that the goal was to reach an agreement in 2008; Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice’s August 2008 remarks with Abbas confirm negotiations were underway, not concluded.

Abbas has said he did not reject Olmert’s offer, but could not accept the map in the meeting because he needed to study its details. Olmert’s later account stresses that Abbas did not respond with a counteroffer before Olmert left office. The two accounts describe different aspects of an unfinished negotiation. Neither changes the central documentary fact: no signed agreement or agreed map resulted.

Why the process stopped

Olmert was facing domestic political and legal pressure and announced his intention to resign in September 2008; Tzipi Livni then led the Israeli negotiating team. Abbas and Olmert did not complete talks before Olmert left office. Their discussions also involved difficult interlocking questions: the exact boundary and land swaps, Jerusalem’s status, refugee arrangements, and security. With no final text, the proposal remained a negotiating package rather than a binding accord.

The episode shows both the scope of the negotiations and their limit: detailed proposals can narrow differences, but leaders must still resolve the text, verify maps, and secure political approval. The official State Department record of Abbas’s 2008 visit describes progress toward a two-state agreement, not a final agreement.

Sources

  1. 1.https://2001-2009.state.gov/secretary/rm/2008/08/108921.htm
  2. 2.https://2001-2009.state.gov/p/nea/rls/rm/2007/96136.htm

Accessibility

These settings are saved on this device.

Preview

Read clearly, your way

Adjust this page while you read. Explore resources

Text
Text sizeApplies across the site.
Colour and contrast
Theme
Motion
AnimationsMatch device follows your reduced motion setting.