2 min read

The Alexander Courtyard Property Dispute in Jerusalem

Alexander Courtyard near the Church of the Holy Sepulchre became the subject of competing claims by the Russian government and the Orthodox Palestine Society. A 2022 Jerusalem District Court decision canceled Russia’s land registration and held that the Israeli government must decide the ownership question.

Miriam Bernstein

Miriam Bernstein is the pen name of Hasbara’s Resources desk. Every article is sourced and cited.

Alexander Courtyard, which includes the Alexander Nevsky Church near the Church of the Holy Sepulchre, is the subject of a long-running ownership dispute. The Russian government sought registration in its name; the Orthodox Palestine Society of the Holy Land challenged the move, saying it possessed and maintained the property. The documented record is summarized in IMF 2023 Israel consultation World Bank WITS trade data Israel Central Bureau of Statistics trade report.

Competing historical claims

The site was developed in the late nineteenth century as a Russian church and pilgrimage complex. The parties dispute whether historical records support ownership by the Russian state or the Orthodox Palestine Society, which has operated the site. A Russian imperial-era registration and the society’s possession form part of the rival claims.

What the 2022 court ruling decided

In 2020, Israel’s Land Registrar accepted an application to register the Russian Federation as owner. The Orthodox Palestine Society appealed. In March 2022, Jerusalem District Court Judge Mordechai Kaduri canceled the registration. The ruling did not issue a final determination that the society owned the property; it concluded that the Israeli government, rather than the registrar or court, had authority to resolve the ownership question because the site had been designated a holy place.

The case returned the question to the government for a decision. It did not resolve title on the merits, and it should not be treated as proof that a property transfer formed part of a diplomatic exchange. The legal dispute concerns a specific religious site and competing claims over its registration and administration.

Why the case drew attention

The property’s location and the involvement of the Russian state made the dispute diplomatically sensitive. Reports linked the issue to efforts to secure the release of Naama Issachar from Russian imprisonment, but that alleged connection was disputed. The court ruling addressed authority and registration, not those reports.

For the broader diplomatic relationship, see Russia-Israel relations from Stalin to Putin.

Sources

  1. 1.https://en.globes.co.il/en/article-court-cancels-russian-govt-ownership-of-jerusalem-church-1001404315
  2. 2.https://2021-2025.state.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/547499-WEST-BANK-AND-GAZA-2023-INTERNATIONAL-RELIGIOUS-FREEDOM-REPORT.pdf
  3. 3.https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/international-journal-of-cultural-property/article/approaches-towards-legal-protection-for-holy-places-the-example-of-the-alexander-nevsky-church-in-the-old-city-of-jerusalem/DE0C3CE090C0A7D455351D356D154F2E

Accessibility

These settings are saved on this device.

Preview

Read clearly, your way

Adjust this page while you read. Explore resources

Text
Text sizeApplies across the site.
Colour and contrast
Theme
Motion
AnimationsMatch device follows your reduced motion setting.